Language does not convey a person's intention -- its usage only provides evidence that there is one present in a person. Thus we are only half right to believe that a person's 'words and actions' must match up or correspond to each other. In truth, they are inseparable, but we are mistaken to think that they must overlap one another, identify with one another, to have any credence. Were we to recognize them as different aspects of the full spectrum to one's person-ality, we might come to realize that one's character is far deeper than 'words' or 'actions' or their occasionally apperceived consummation.